参考文献
1. Taborsky, M., Sneakers, satellites, and helpers: parasiticand cooperative behavior in fish reproduction. Advances in the Study ofBehavior, 1994. 23(1): p. e100.
2. Svensson,O. and C. Kvarnemo, Sexually selectednest‐building–Pomatoschistusminutus males build smaller nest‐openings inthe presence of sneaker males. Journal of evolutionary biology, 2003. 16(5): p. 896-902.
3. Dominey,W.J., Female mimicry in male bluegillsunfish—a genetic polymorphism? Nature, 1980. 284(5756): p. 546.
4. Neff,B.D., P. Fu, and M.R. Gross, Sperminvestment and alternative mating tactics in bluegill sunfish (Lepomismacrochirus). Behavioral Ecology, 2003. 14(5): p. 634-641.
5. Lamichhaney,S., et al., Structural genomic changesunderlie alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff (Philomachus pugnax).Nature Genetics, 2016. 48(1): p. 84.
6. Magnhagen,C., Predation risk as a cost ofreproduction. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 1991. 6(6): p. 183-186.
7. Dakin,R. and R. Montgomerie, Deceptivecopulation calls attract female visitors to peacock leks. The AmericanNaturalist, 2014. 183(4): p.558-564.
8. Eberhard,M.J.W., The evolution of social behaviorby kin selection. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 1975. 50(1): p. 1-33.
9. Pizzari,T., Food, vigilance, and sperm: the roleof male direct benefits in the evolution of female preference in a polygamousbird. Behavioral Ecology, 2003. 14(5):p. 593-601.
10. Wilson,D.R., et al., Alarm calling best predictsmating and reproductive success in ornamented male fowl, Gallus gallus.Animal Behaviour, 2008. 76(3): p.543-554.